Wednesday, April 23, 2008
revolutions of the middleclassed?
all the revolutions I've read about have stemmed from a poor population able to live in the wilderness while waging there attacks. what of a populous who still has homes? does the act of having a residence negate the ability to revolt? if so is keeping us housed part of the plan to usurp our rights? (doubt-full, homelessness is not a priority for our leaders)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
As the pacifist hippy that I am, I think we need to come up with a way to peacefully revolt. But, to answer your question, no. Having a home does not make it impossible. It just makes many apathetic.
Post a Comment